Behind the Build

How We Test Before We Trust

A rack is a simple promise: put a bike on it, and the bike stays there. Every mile, every pothole, every hour of sun. Before we sold anyone that promise, we spent a long time making sure we could actually keep it.

That testing started close to home, on the roads that lead into the North Fruita Desert and the trailheads scattered across Colorado's western slope. This region is something like a mecca for mountain bikers, but getting to any of those trails rarely means smooth pavement the whole way. More often it's washboard gravel that shakes a truck bed apart, loose dirt that shifts under the tires, or a back road that's half washed out from the last storm. So that's where we started: not on the trail itself, but on the drive there, because a rack that can't hold a bike steady on the approach isn't going to matter once you arrive.

From there, we went further, and longer. We've lost count of the actual number of road trips at this point — it's somewhere in the dozens — but three of them stand out as the ones worth telling. One ran from Fruita all the way to Bentonville, Arkansas, crossing several states and just about every kind of road surface you'd expect along the way. The rack came through without a single failure. Another pointed the truck toward Big Bear, California, and into a different kind of test altogether: heat. For several days, temperatures climbed past 110 degrees. That's exactly the kind of condition that tends to soften padding or warp materials that weren't built for it, so we watched closely. Nothing gave. The padding held its shape and did its job the entire way. A third, up to Powderhorn, told the same story again: paved, washboard, dirt, or washed-out, the rack kept the bikes secure and fully protected, mile after mile.

Somewhere between all those road trips, we did something a lot less glamorous. We call it Neanderthal engineering, and it's exactly what it sounds like: we hit the rack with hammers, stomped it into the ground, and did whatever else a group of people standing around a prototype could think of to try to break it. None of it was scientific. All of it was stubborn. The logic was simple — if a prototype could survive that kind of abuse, we figured it could survive whatever a real trailhead threw at it. It worked, and by the time we were done, the current design had more than 2,000 real-world miles behind it. Not laboratory miles. Actual road miles, in every condition a truck really drives through to get somewhere worth riding.

The part of the rack that actually cradles the bike went through twenty-four different versions before we landed on the one we sell today. It started as cardboard, because cardboard is cheap and fast and tells you quickly whether an idea is worth pursuing. From there it became wood, then a series of 3D-printed versions, each one testing a slightly different shape, each one teaching us something new about where a bike's weight actually needs to rest and where it doesn't. Eventually we arrived at aircraft-grade aluminum for the frame and custom urethane padding at every point where the bike touches the rack. That combination gives you real strength without unnecessary weight, and padding that holds a bike firmly in place without scuffing the finish. It's a simple idea on paper. Getting there took two dozen tries.

Prototypes failed along the way, and that's exactly what prototypes are supposed to do. Every time one broke, we went back, figured out what needed to change, and built the next version stronger and easier to use than the last. Nothing left the shop until it stopped breaking.

All of this took longer than it needed to. Twenty-four cradle designs and dozens of road trips is not the fast path to a finished product. But a rack that fails at highway speed with a bike strapped to it isn't a minor inconvenience — it's genuinely dangerous, for the bike, for the truck, and for whoever's driving behind you. Given the choice between shipping sooner and shipping something we'd trust with our own bikes, we'll take longer every time.

That's the short version of a long process: dozens of trips through Colorado, Arkansas, California, and back, temperatures past 110 degrees, more than a few hammer strikes and stomps we'd rather not admit to, twenty-four attempts at getting one part right, and over 2,000 miles proving it. Not a claim we're making for the sake of a blog post. Just what it actually took.

← Back to the Journal